AirVPN Review (2026): The Provider That Gave Up a Country

Disclosure: VPNFin is reader-supported. If you buy a VPN through links on this page, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never affects our ratings — here’s our full disclosure.

In February 2024 an Italian company told Italian customers to go elsewhere. AirVPN, based in Perugia, began requiring every buyer to declare they were not resident in Italy.

Nothing forced it out. Italy’s Piracy Shield obliges intermediaries to block whatever rights holders enter into a portal, within thirty minutes, before any judge sees the list. AirVPN decided that executing that list was worse than losing the market, and left.

Is AirVPN Any Good?

For a narrow group of people, yes. Open-source clients, port forwarding on every account, only OpenVPN and WireGuard, and real-time statistics published for every server it runs.

For most people, no. Streaming barely works, five devices is restrictive, the interface assumes expertise, and there is no independent audit of the no-logs claim.

⚠️ We score it 3.2, and that number says something about our scale. Two of our five criteria measure things AirVPN deliberately does not attempt.

Look at Mullvad →
The same values, plus published audits and a police warrant that found nothing

The Italian Exit

Worth telling properly, because no other provider has done this.

The announcement came on 6 February 2024, effective on the 19th. From that date, buyers had to confirm they were not Italian residents.

AirVPN’s own reasoning was published in full. The blocking lists are compiled by private bodies authorised by the regulator. Blocks run within thirty minutes, without judicial review, without a hearing, and with no way to refuse in real time even where the error is obvious. Objections come afterwards.

Its conclusion was that the requirements were too burdensome economically and technically, incompatible with its purpose, and a route to blocking across every area of activity.

⚠️ It also pointed Italians somewhere else. The company noted more than a decade of support for the Tor network, which remains reachable from Italy, rather than pretending the loss was painless.

Timeline of AirVPN closing its Italian market from the launch of Piracy Shield to the European Commission's objections

What It Does Well

Four things, and they are unusual rather than incremental.

Real-time transparency. Load, bandwidth and connected users are published for every server, continuously. Nobody else in our catalogue does this.

Open-source clients. Eddie can be read rather than trusted, and AirVPN runs no proprietary protocol at all — OpenVPN and WireGuard only.

Port forwarding, free, up to twenty ports. That matters for torrenting and for self-hosting, and it has been disappearing across the category — our torrenting guide covers why.

No email needed to sign up, with seven cryptocurrencies among the payment options. Only Mullvad matches that among the providers we cover.

What It Does Not

The list is as unusual as the strengths, and it is longer.

No independent audit, of any kind. For a provider whose entire proposition is trust, that is the single largest gap.

Italy is a Fourteen Eyes member. Data retention there applies to telecoms rather than to VPNs, but the jurisdiction is what it is.

Streaming does not work. Not poorly — reviewers report it failing on the major platforms, and our streaming guide would not put it on a shortlist.

Five simultaneous devices, against an industry norm of eight to ten and unlimited from Surfshark among others.

Eddie assumes you know what you want. Twelve tabs of preferences, every port treated as its own protocol option, and no graphical client on iOS.

What AirVPN lets you verify in real time set against the questions no published document answers

Transparency Without Verification

This is the tension the review turns on, and it deserves more than a bullet.

AirVPN publishes more operational data than anyone we cover. Server load, user counts, bandwidth, all live. That is verification of a sort, because it is checkable at any moment by anyone.

What it does not publish is an audit. The difference between the two matters: live statistics show what the network is doing, while an audit examines whether the systems could retain anything.

⚠️ The Italian exit is evidence of a kind as well. A company willing to lose a market rather than run a blocklist is telling you something about its priorities. It is not the same as a police warrant producing nothing, and it is not nothing either.

Compare that with the field. Mullvad had officers arrive with a warrant and hand back empty, and it also publishes audits. AirVPN has conviction and no report.

ProviderNo-logs auditsAuditorJurisdiction
NordVPN6PwC, DeloittePanama
Surfshark2DeloitteNetherlands (9 Eyes)
ExpressVPN3KPMGBritish Virgin Islands, Kape-owned
CyberGhost3DeloitteRomania, Kape-owned
PureVPN4KPMGBVI, operated from Pakistan
IPVanish2Leviathan, SchellmanUnited States (Five Eyes), Ziff Davis-owned
Windscribe1Packetlabs, production infrastructureCanada (Five Eyes); Greek case dismissed, no data to give
Proton VPN5SecuritumSwitzerland, moving infrastructure to EU
Private Internet Access3DeloitteUnited States (Five Eyes), Kape-owned
Mullvad10+Cure53, Assured ABSweden (14 Eyes)
TunnelBearAnnual since 2017Cure53Canada (Five Eyes), US parent
Norton VPN2VerSpriteUnited States (Five Eyes)
Hotspot Shield0protocol audited, policy notUnited States (Five Eyes)
AirVPN0none — the client is open source insteadItaly (14 Eyes)
IVPN8, annual since inceptionCure53Gibraltar (status disputed)
Hide.me1 modern, in 2024Securitum, though one source names Altius ITMalaysia (outside the alliances)
PrivadoVPN0none in six years of operationIceland (moved from Switzerland, 2026)
TorGuard0none; settled a lawsuit without disclosing recordsUnited States (Five Eyes)
FastestVPN1, in 2023Altius ITCayman Islands (outside the alliances)
StrongVPN0none in over two decadesUnited States (Five Eyes), Ziff Davis-owned
VyprVPN1, in 2018Leviathan Security, before the 2023 saleUnited States (Five Eyes), Certida-owned since 2023
PrivateVPN0none; support says there is nothing to auditSweden (14 Eyes), ownership disputed
ZoogVPN0none; support describes one as plannedGreece (outside the alliances), run from Ukraine
Check Proton VPN →
Five audits published in full, and an interface that does not require a manual

Price

Around €7 for a single month, falling to roughly €2.75 a month on the longest term, with plans running from three days to three years.

Every plan gets the same features. No premium tier, no add-ons, no feature gating — which is rarer than it sounds.

⚠️ The refund position is genuinely unclear. AirVPN’s terms describe a 30-day money-back guarantee, while some reviewers report nothing beyond the three-day plan. We could not reconcile the two, so treat the three-day option as the reliable way to test it.

Who It Is For

Buy it if you self-host, torrent, or run Linux, and if reading a preferences pane for twenty minutes sounds like a feature rather than a chore.

Do not buy it for streaming, for a household, or as a first VPN. What a VPN actually hides applies here as everywhere, and this one asks more of you than most.

⚠️ We have no affiliate relationship with AirVPN, and no link on this page earns us anything. That is worth stating on a review this positive about a company’s character.

Who AirVPN suits and who should skip it, from torrenting and self-hosting to streaming and household use

How We Research

This review draws on TorrentFreak, Techdirt and Walled Culture for the announcement of 6 February 2024 and AirVPN’s published reasoning, on TechRadar for the position as of 2025 and the European Commission’s concerns about Piracy Shield, on Cloudwards and Australian VPN for the client behaviour, port forwarding limits, server counts and device limit, on Jazod and All About Cookies for the absence of a third-party audit, and on SafetyDetectives and ProPrivacy for pricing and payment options. Two of those sites belong to companies that also sell VPNs, which we map in full, and we weighted them accordingly. We do not run our own tests. Our full method lives on the About Us page.

AirVPN FAQ

Why did AirVPN stop serving Italy?

Because Italy’s Piracy Shield requires intermediaries to block whatever authorised rights holders enter into a portal, within thirty minutes, with no judicial review and no way to refuse in real time. AirVPN judged that too burdensome and incompatible with its purpose, and closed the market from 19 February 2024.

Has AirVPN been audited?

No. We found no third-party no-logs audit of any kind, which is the largest gap in an otherwise privacy-focused service. It publishes live server statistics instead, which is checkable but tests a different question from whether the systems could retain anything.

Is AirVPN good for torrenting?

It is one of the better options for it. P2P runs on every server, port forwarding is included free with up to twenty ports, and the client exposes enough control to configure a torrent stack properly. Streaming, by contrast, essentially does not work.

How many devices does AirVPN allow?

Five simultaneous connections, against an industry norm of eight to ten and unlimited from Surfshark and Private Internet Access. For a single technical user that is ample; for a household it is the reason to look elsewhere.

Does AirVPN offer a refund?

Its terms describe a thirty-day money-back guarantee, though some reviewers report nothing beyond the paid three-day plan. We could not reconcile the two accounts, so the three-day option is the dependable way to test the service before committing.

AirVPN

VPNFin Team

Principled, transparent, and unproven by anyone outside the company
Speed
Security & Privacy
Streaming
Price & Value
Ease of Use

Summary

Open-source clients, port forwarding on every account, live statistics for every server, and a company that gave up its home market rather than run a blocking list. The costs are no audit at all, a Fourteen Eyes jurisdiction, five devices, and streaming that does not work.

3.2

Final Verdict

AirVPN is the most principled unproven service we cover. It gave up a country rather than run a blocking list, it publishes live data nobody else publishes, and it has never commissioned an audit.

Our 3.2 is a fair score and an incomplete one. Streaming and ease of use are two of our five criteria, and AirVPN treats both as somebody else’s problem. Judged only on privacy engineering it would sit far higher.

So read the score as a match rating rather than a quality rating. If you are the person this is built for, you already know it. If you are not, Proton VPN offers similar values with audits and an interface, and our Italy guide explains why the country in this story matters.

See NordVPN Plans →
If you wanted streaming and ten devices rather than twenty forwarded ports
Scroll to Top