Disclosure: VPNFin is reader-supported. If you buy a VPN through links on this page, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never affects our ratings — here’s our full disclosure.
TorGuard vs PrivateVPN puts two long-running independent providers side by side, and they have a great deal in common. Both offer port forwarding, both sell or include dedicated IPs, and neither has ever had an independent no-logs audit.
What sets them apart is how each has handled scrutiny. Film studios sued TorGuard, and it settled in 2022 without disclosing customer records. PrivateVPN, asked about audits, reportedly told a reviewer there was nothing to audit because it keeps no logs. Beyond that, TorGuard leans towards restrictive networks, and PrivateVPN towards streaming.
TorGuard vs PrivateVPN: The Short Answer
Choose PrivateVPN over TorGuard for streaming and price. It rates 3.2 in our PrivateVPN review, costs around $2 a month on its three-year plan, and includes a free dedicated IP on one plan.
Choose TorGuard for restrictive networks. It rates 3.1 in our TorGuard review, and GreatFirewallGuide ranked it second for China in April 2026.
Both include port forwarding, which few providers still offer. Neither has an audit.
Privacy: Neither Audited, Different Records
TorGuard’s evidence is its conduct. When roughly twenty-five film studios sued in 2021, it settled in March 2022 by agreeing to block BitTorrent on its US servers, rather than keep logs, and handed over no customer records. VPNetworks LLC runs it from Orlando, inside the Five Eyes.
PrivateVPN’s evidence is its word. Its support’s reported reply, that there is nothing to audit, restates the claim rather than proving it, and the same reviewer was told its servers run on disk rather than RAM. Nobody has linked it to an incident in seventeen years. It operates from Sweden, inside the Fourteen Eyes, and sources disagree on whether it is independent or owned by Miss Group.
⚠️ Neither gives you what an audit gives. Our audit tracker and our no-logs guide explain why that matters more than policy wording.
| Provider | No-logs audits | Auditor | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|---|
| NordVPN | 6 | PwC, Deloitte | Panama |
| Surfshark | 2 | Deloitte | Netherlands (9 Eyes) |
| ExpressVPN | 3 | KPMG (28 security reports in total) | British Virgin Islands, Kape-owned |
| CyberGhost | 3 | Deloitte | Romania, Kape-owned |
| PureVPN | 4 | KPMG | BVI, operated from Pakistan |
| IPVanish | 2 | Leviathan, Schellman | United States (Five Eyes), Ziff Davis-owned |
| Windscribe | 1 | Packetlabs, production infrastructure | Canada (Five Eyes); Greek case dismissed, no data to give |
| Proton VPN | 5 | Securitum | Switzerland, moving infrastructure to EU |
| Private Internet Access | 3 | Deloitte | United States (Five Eyes), Kape-owned |
| Mullvad | 10+ | Cure53, Assured AB | Sweden (14 Eyes) |
| TunnelBear | Annual since 2017 | Cure53 | Canada (Five Eyes), US parent |
| Norton VPN | 2 | VerSprite | United States (Five Eyes) |
| Hotspot Shield | 0 | protocol audited, policy not | United States (Five Eyes) |
| AirVPN | 0 | none — the client is open source instead | Italy (14 Eyes) |
| IVPN | 8, annual since inception | Cure53 | Gibraltar (status disputed) |
| Hide.me | 1 modern, in 2024 | Securitum, though one source names Altius IT | Malaysia (outside the alliances) |
| PrivadoVPN | 0 | none in six years of operation | Iceland (moved from Switzerland, 2026) |
| TorGuard | 0 | none; settled a lawsuit without disclosing records | United States (Five Eyes) |
| FastestVPN | 1, in 2023 | Altius IT | Cayman Islands (outside the alliances) |
| StrongVPN | 0 | none in over two decades | United States (Five Eyes), Ziff Davis-owned |
| VyprVPN | 1, in 2018 | Leviathan Security, before the 2023 sale | United States (Five Eyes), Certida-owned since 2023 |
| PrivateVPN | 0 | none; support says there is nothing to audit | Sweden (14 Eyes), ownership disputed |
| ZoogVPN | 0 | none; support describes one as planned | Greece (outside the alliances), run from Ukraine |
| Malwarebytes Privacy VPN | 1, in 2026 | X41 D-Sec, white-box over two months | United States (Five Eyes), runs AzireVPN infrastructure |
| Astrill | 0 | — | Disputed: Seychelles or Liechtenstein |
TorGuard vs PrivateVPN on Price
PrivateVPN costs around $2 a month on its three-year plan, well below TorGuard’s entry price. Check the renewal at checkout before committing to three years.
Reviewers report TorGuard’s Standard plan at $4.27 to $10.99 a month, with streaming on a higher tier and dedicated IPs sold separately. Our renewal price table shows why renewals decide the real cost.
TorGuard vs PrivateVPN on Features
Port forwarding: both include it, and PrivateVPN adds SOCKS5 support. Our port forwarding guide lists the few others.
Dedicated IPs: PrivateVPN includes one free on a single plan; TorGuard sells them as add-ons. Our dedicated IP guide explains who needs one.
Torrenting: TorGuard blocks BitTorrent on its US servers since 2022. Our torrenting guide covers the alternatives.
Streaming: reviewers report Netflix, iPlayer, Disney+ and Prime Video working reliably on PrivateVPN. TorGuard puts streaming on a separate, pricier tier. Our Netflix guide explains the landscape.
Restrictive networks: TorGuard’s Stealth VPN servers and Stealth Proxy scored 78% in GreatFirewallGuide’s China tests; PrivateVPN has a Stealth mode. Our obfuscation guide explains the approach.
What Each One Lacks
TorGuard lacks an audit, open apps and US torrenting, and its interface is the recurring complaint in reviews.
PrivateVPN lacks an audit, RAM-only servers and scale. Its network is around 200 servers in 63 countries, its speed reports vary widely, and its live chat is not staffed around the clock.
Which One
PrivateVPN for streaming, torrenting with a free dedicated IP, and the lowest price, if an unaudited claim is acceptable to you. Astrill vs PrivateVPN covers the same choice from another angle.
TorGuard for restrictive networks, stealth tools and dedicated IP work, with a record under legal pressure. NordVPN vs PrivateVPN and TorGuard vs FastestVPN set each against another rival.
How We Research
PrivateVPN’s support answers, price, features and ownership dispute come from our PrivateVPN review and tables, and TorGuard’s settlement, ownership, price range and features from our TorGuard review. The China score comes from GreatFirewallGuide’s April 2026 review of TorGuard. We do not run our own tests. Our full approach lives on the About Us page.
TorGuard vs PrivateVPN FAQ
In TorGuard vs PrivateVPN, the two rate almost level, 3.2 against 3.1. PrivateVPN is better for streaming and price; TorGuard for restrictive networks and dedicated IP work.
No. PrivateVPN’s support reportedly said there was nothing to audit. TorGuard settled a studio lawsuit in 2022 without disclosing customer records.
Yes. Both include it, and PrivateVPN adds SOCKS5 support.
PrivateVPN, at around $2 a month on its three-year plan. Reviewers report TorGuard’s Standard plan at $4.27 to $10.99 a month.
TorGuard has the published evidence: GreatFirewallGuide scored it at 78% in April 2026. We have no comparable figure for PrivateVPN.
The Verdict
TorGuard vs PrivateVPN is nearly a tie on our scores, and the choice depends on the job. PrivateVPN streams better and costs less; TorGuard handles restrictive networks better and has a tested record under legal pressure.
Neither has an audit, so for everyday privacy an audited provider remains the safer choice.